The Buffalo News editorial board praises a very bad policy, Governor Spitzer's raising of the limits on charter schools and his "transitional aid" to the public schools.
The doubling of the cap gives charter school proponents several
years to add schools and add quality to what charter schools offer. As
Peter Murphy of the New York Charter Schools Association said, there is
enough administrative and statutory rigor, and enough safeguards, to
argue that a cap is unwarranted. But raising the cap to 200 allows room
for both expansion and further evaluation.
The transition aid,
along with huge overall increases in state education funding, should
soften the blow for school districts that lose much of the per-pupil
aid when children shift from public to charter schools. The $12 million
in transition aid is designed to ease the impact of future student
shifts, although it won’t help districts recover costs for students who
already have left.
School districts should be heartened by this
first-ever response to the funding impact problem by the Spitzer
administration, the Division of Budget and the State Legislature,
including work by Assemblyman Sam Hoyt, D-Buffalo.
The loss of
per-pupil aid has put a squeeze on districts, an expense Buffalo School
District Chief Financial Officer Gary M. Crosby has calculated for the
city system. The difference between the drain and the $12 million in
aid comes to about $28 million, he said.
Well, of course, the loss of per-student aid to the charter schools has put a squeeze on districts -- that was the point. The primary benefit of charter schools (which, we must remember, are "public" schools) was to provide more personalized and more effective schooling to children who weren't being served adequately, but the second was to inject some competition into the public school system.
By eliminating the pain of losing the student subsidies, the Governor has removed the incentive for the older schools to improve. Now, I applaud Mr. Spitzer for his support of charter schools, but will his "transitional" aid now have to become become permanent aid? Will it now be built into each succeeding year's budget? If that happens, the teachers' unions' opposition to charter schools will dissolve. After all, they wouldn't mind charter schools any more than they do private schools as long as they weren't financially harmed by them.
Sooner or later, someone in New York State is going to have to stand up to the unions and tell them that we think we're spending quite enough money on our school's already, thank you, and now it's your turn to hold up your end. The loss of per-student aid had been working to bring around changes to the traditional schools. Governor Spitzer's compromise has seriously weakened that.