The battle over what to do with A.M.&A.'s is ready to heat up again.
Two prominent local developers are calling for the demolition of the
long-vacant AM&A’s department store on Main Street downtown.
And they want the city to take the lead role in razing the deteriorating former store to create a “prime, shovel-ready” site.
“It’s
a major eyesore, a blight on downtown,” said Ellicott Development chief
Carl P. Paladino. “The time has come to knock it down.”
They're right, of course. When it looked as if a big New York City developer was going to convert it into apartments, everyone was happy. But now that the deal's fallen through, expect the preservationists to try and stop any attempts to tear the old pile of bricks down.
They'll claim that it's an excellent example of late 1940's modernism -- well, read for yourself.
The
former J.N. Adam department store, one of the best pieces of modernism on Main
Street, has been a major component of downtown streetscape for half a century.
It presents a masterful play of abstract form, interconnecting horizontal and
vertical elements with the sophistication of a Gershwin arrangement. Unified
horizontal window bands and layered horizontal monochrome materials: travertine-like
stone, buff brick banded with glazed buff tiles, subtly reinforce the linear
precision of the composition. The crowning glory of the whole complex is the
Washington Street elevation three earlier components designed by Buffalo architects:
E.B. Green, 1892 and 1896, and Esenwein &Johnson,1909, are well-preserved.
That's one way of looking at it. On the other hand it's also a motley collection of very old and very inefficient buildings which have been disguised by a unifying facade. And that facade, while admittedly created by "the designers of Saks Fifth Avenue,
Bloomingdale's Lexington Avenue and Lord &Taylor's Fifth Avenue", is just that -- a fake covering.
Don't be "guilted' into thinking that tearing it down would forever erase an irreplaceable part of America's architectural history. It just isn't so. The building's old and deteriorating and sits on, if we ever can agree to return cars to Main Street, a valuable piece of property.
Now, I'm not saying that should be in any great rush to raze it. We can wait a bit -- no reason to have a city block sit empty. But we should agree now that if a solid proposal comes along like the one that would have seen HealthNow locate there, it'll be promptly demolished. And an enlightened city planning department might even require that the facade of its replacement echo 1940's modernism.
Hey, fake now is as good as fake then.